The Zoukei-Mura 1/48 F-4S Phantom II

Model, Pictures, and Text by Richard Powers.

(Editors Note: Having performed engineering work for McDonnell-Douglas on 1/1 scale Phantoms, Richard Powers has an interesting take on painting and finishing a scale “Smoki’n Thunder Hog.”  It’s a real pleasure to have his work on MPS. Many Thanks Richard–Awesome Build!)    



I have a soft spot for the F-4. My first job out of college (1967) was in the aerodynamics department of McDonnell. I was put on the F-4 project temporarily until my secret security clearance was approved. I calculated external store drag index data for the F-4J pilot’s handbook updates. I remember walking on the flight line at lunch- Phantoms for the USN, USAF, USMC, Germany, Israel, Iran….



After a decades-long absence from modeling, my re-entry was sparked by Eduard’s Limited Edition “Good Morning Da Nang” F-4B particularly since the included VF-84 black-tailed “skull and crossbones” has long been one of my favorite color schemes. My second Phantom completed last year, was Hasegawa’s F-4G in Hill 2 camouflage. When Zoukei-Mura’s F-4J was issued, I immediately snatched one. When Z-M’s Sierra version (kit# SWS48-05) came out I bought one of those as well: ditto the “D” and same for the Marine “J” re-boxing–except I bought two 🙂


Since I had built a Navy Phantom and a USAF Phantom it was time for a Marine bird. Furball’s “Low-Viz Devil Dog Rhinos” (48-063) decal set included a nice selection of eleven Marine Sierras (and one J) so I decided to build the F-4S. I vacillated between VMFA-333 and VMFA-232 finally settling on 232 in the “tactical” camouflage.

This was my first Zoukei-Mura kit, my first time using Mission Models Paint and my second painting experience with the Iwata HP Plus C.


The Build:

I’m a minimalist when it comes to super-detailing. I always build with closed canopies, equipment bay access doors shut and similar items. No model can accurately reproduce the busy-ness in any cockpit, not to mention internal canopy framing, latches and other gizmos. So,despite wonderful interior details, I used the closed canopy option, retracted the airbrakes and shut the auxiliary air doors.


The fully slatted wing is one distinguishing feature of the ‘S’ version. Although the inboard wing slats are retractable (and probably would be retracted sitting on the flight line) I decided to model the slats in the extended position.



Photos of the Sierra version show the most common USMC loadout to be centerline fuel tank, inboard pylons with AIM-9 launchers and no outboard pylons. That’s what I built with four AIM-9s and two AIM-7s.

Without going into a lot of detail, some of my observations are summarized below.

There are lots of tiny parts to manipulate. I didn’t follow the suggested instruction sequences and only glued the bits when it was absolutely necessary. The instructions are good at showing where to cut parts away from the sprues. Be careful: the first slat actuator I removed I cut in the wrong place resulting in an actuator that couldn’t’ support the slat. Luckily, there are three per slat.

Of course, getting the fuselage halves together with the dorsal insert and cockpit tub is critical. When I dry-fitted the fuselage halves and dorsal insert together, I found that the edges of depressed dorsal area didn’t meet and couldn’t be glued. With the insert and lower fuselage/wing piece there isn’t a lot of glueable surface for the fuselage halves.









All Mission Models Primers, Paints, Metallics, and Clear Coats         10% OFF !

Visit our Mission Modes Paint Page

After completing the cockpit tub and grinding away until it fit between the halves with no resulting gap, I started by taping the nose together (cockpit tub in place) making sure the fuselage halves aligned. I then glued the aft end – vertical fin and lower fuselage. Next, I dry-fitted the dorsal insert, gently sanding edges until I was satisfied with the fit. I taped it in place and used several strips of styrene glued between the depressed dorsal area edges to stabilize the fit.


Next, I glued the fuselage front together with cockpit tub in place. (In retrospect, I prefer Academy’s “lobster back” approach. I think it’s more fool-proof). The kit seats, although simplified compared to Eduard’s version in their F-4B reboxing, are adequate. I’m building a Phantom with ejection seats, not a model of the seat surrounded by a Phantom. Z-M doesn’t include belts and harnesses which is a shame. The prominent yellow/black face curtain and the belts/harnesses are quite noticeable even with closed canopy. To remedy this omission, I used Furball ‘s “F-4B/N, J/S Cockpit Detail Set” (48-047) which includes decals for instrument panels, side consoles, ejection seat face curtain, and seat belts/harnesses. The seat belts look OK (but not great) when in place through the closed canopy. The ejection seat face curtain decals didn’t work at all. I replaced them with PE parts from an Eduard seatbelt set.



The main landing gear fits into the wing via a side facing tab. This provides positive orientation of the gear. Further, the gear is supported by the wing upper surface, the landing gear strut projecting so that, if everything is aligned, the model’s weight is supported by the strut/wing top surface glue joint. Somehow, when I glued the main landing gear in place, I missed this detail – there was a gap between the strut and the wing. I didn’t notice it until I set the model on the landing gear. After an hour or so the left gear had started to collapse inward. I remedied this somewhat with shims of 0.02” thick styrene set in place with a glob of 5-minute epoxy. That’s why you won’t see any head-on photos.

Zoukei-Mura’s missiles are very nice, with body molded separately from the fins. The AIM-7 body includes the external conduit and the AIM-9 fins include the “rollerons”. No need for aftermarket parts here.

There are lots of parts: building isn’t difficult, just tedious.









When I completed basic assembly, (airframe ready; landing gear/tires, exhaust nozzles canopy, slats, stabilators to be painted separately before attaching), it was time to paint.

This is my first model using Mission Models paint. I previously used Model Master enamels. I liked the colors available, how they handled with my airbrush, and they were stocked by the local “Hobby Town” about a five-minute drive from home. This ended in January 2018 when they went out of business. The remaining options were a long annoying drive to Berkeley or mail order. I had read about Mission Models acrylics, so I decided to switch from enamels and give them a try. After deciding on the F-4S in the “tactical” camouflage for my next model, I ordered enough colors to get me through the build. Of course, only the primary camouflage colors aren’t enough for a build, so my order included thinner, polymix, primers, metallics, and basics -white & black…But, just in case I also ordered colors for a Viet Nam camouflage F-4D and Light Gull Gray / Insignia White for a “J” if I changed my mind. My order arrived quickly, and I started playing with the new paints. I used my airbrush to create color chips on styrene sheet. The colors looked right on. I experimented with the paints by painting the interior parts while on the sprues.

Shoot 1 mm Lines  and  Primers—–All With One Brush: The Infinity

For Tips on Fine-Line Airbrushing and Configuring the Harder-Steenbeck Infinity for Super Fine-Line Work and for Spraying Primers and Clear Coats, Check This Out⇒


Priming. After cleaning the surfaces with denatured alcohol, I airbrushed MMS-002 “White Primer” (thinned to 60% with MMP thinner) on the aft fuselage natural metal areas. The first coat (several passes with the airbrush) lightly sanded with a 4,000 grit pad followed by a second coat, again sanded. Then the natural metal area was masked with Tamiya tape to be painted last. The remainder was airbrushed with two coats of 60% MMS-003 “Gray Primer”. Each coat consisted of multiple passes of the airbrush, carefully layering the primer to avoid flooding the surface – although I didn’t count the number of passes I’d guess about 10 for each coat. Each primer coat was lightly sanded with 1500 grit paper to remove the “tooth”. The primer color was very close to the plastic color making it difficult to determine whether coverage was complete. (Lesson: it’s probably a good idea to prime with a color different from the final coat.) Small parts – slats, landing gear doors, stabilators – were primed on their sprues. Priming complete, any bad joints or other imperfections were corrected with putty. I use Deluxe Materials “Perfect Plastic Putty”, a water-base filler. The excess can be easily removed with a Q-tip.


Now for the finish coat using paints thinned to 60% with Thinner-10 (MMP thinner with 10% Polymix) starting with the lightest, “Light Ghost Gray”(MMP-073), on the undersurfaces. Although I’m not a fan of heavily weathered models, I thought I would try pre-shading the undersurfaces so I outlined the control surface hinge lines with “Gunship Gray” (MMP-084) and applied random patches of White to provide some variation in the uniform color. The LGG finish coat was applied with multiple layers airbrushed until I thought the pre-shading was barely visible.








Next, “Dark Ghost Gray” (MMP-074) on fuselage sides and vertical fin. Separation lines between colors were masked using 3M Mounting Putty rolled into 1/8” diameter worms. (I have never had issues with 3M putty. Even if left on the paint for several weeks it doesn’t leave residue.) [Editors note: Agreed!] Again, slowly layering the paint, taking my time. When the DGG was complete I noticed that there was no noticeable contrast between LGG and DGG. Not good. As a test, I sprayed patches of the two colors on my paint test model (an abandoned Hasegawa 109). This showed that the two colors do have discernable differences in color and the separation line should be noticeable. I suspected that my finish coats were not opaque, and the primer was showing through. Time to re-paint.








After lightly sanding the DGG areas, I started applying another coat. OK-now I had an acceptable DGG coat, although the undersurface LGG needed some additional work. I started the Medium Gray (MMP-072) coat – upper nose, fuselage tops, part of the vertical tail. Again, 3M Poster Putty was used to mask borders between the colors. The MG coat went off without a hitch. Nice and opaque with visible differentiation between MG and DGG.



Then back to the LGG undersurfaces. First, a light sanding with 1500 grit paper to remove and “tooth”, then layering the paint. Bye-bye to pre-shading, but hello to color differential: the three base colors look good.

After touching up spots where paint spray carried over to adjacent areas (more tedious than it sounds) , time for the natural metal aft fuselage which was still primed and taped.


I removed masking tape from NMF area and reverse-masked the painted area. I airbrushed a base coat of MMM-005 Duraluminum. While I was working with metal paints, I also sprayed the exhaust nozzles with MMM-002 Cold Rolled Steel (CRS), which required several coats for coverage. I also used CRS to overspray the Duraluminum for the darker parts of the aft fuselage metal panels. When dry, I masked and airbrushed several metal panels with MMM-007 Dark Aluminum. Inboard sections of the horizontal stabilizers were painted with White Aluminum, Dark Aluminum and Dural.


I’m not a fan of heavy panel line wash use, where every seam stands out equally – aircraft skin joints are engineered to be as smooth as possible. After reviewing photos, I decided to emphasize panel lines (actually access panels, as opposed to skin joints) on the nose forward of the intakes, on fuselage sides, aft of the intakes, and above the metal panels on the aft fuselage. I used Testors Createfx Black wash (actually a brownish black). Some of the panels were more prominent that I wanted, so I re-sprayed MG or DGG as appropriate.

For the metal panels and exhaust nozzles, which can show engine exhaust and heat-related stains, I used Tamiya Black panel line wash followed by an overall wash of Testor’s Createfx Black. Tamiya Black Panel Line Accent Color was also used to emphasize the stabilator leading edge slat.



The tactical camouflage apparently eliminated the myriad of access panel stencils, leaving only the NATO servicing symbols and a few warning stencils; not many, but some are very small – “NO STEP” and “NO PUSH”- and lots of these. Before applying the decals I tested one from the Furball set on a test paint patch. Even though the patch wasn’t gloss, the decal settled nicely with no silvering. I did, however, apply gloss clear coat before applying the decals: MMA-006 thinned to 25% with thinner. I only layered a few airbrush passes, and didn’t intend to go to a full gloss finish.

Furball’s decals are VERY thin with minimal carrier film between letters but can be somewhat fragile. I used Micro-Sol to get the decals in place – particularly the smaller decals, and Micro-Set to get them to snuggle down. In the process I broke a few letters and numbers, visible in the photos, but nothing serious. After completing the decals, I noticed that the large “5881” on the aft fuselage seemed to be the wrong color. According to photos of Marine Sierras in tactical camouflage, the serial number, “MARINES”, vertical tail code (WD) and the intake warning chevron should all be the same dark color. Here “5881” was a lighter color. I cobbled together two replacement serial numbers from the decal sheet. If you look closely at the photos, you’ll see that the “1” is a bit darker than the other numbers – it is really an “I” from “MARINES”.


External Stores: The AIM-9 and AIM-7 decals used a combination of kit (stripes) and TwoBobs (other details) with a healthy dose of Solvaset. It’s surprisingly difficult to apply a decal stripe to a cylindrical missile body. Stripes are either too fragile or too stiff. If not precisely aligned they’ll be candy stripes. It took patience and a few wasted decals.



Decals finished, painting done, access panel lines accented–time for the clear flat coat. Following the suggestions found here (link) I thinned MMA-004 “Flat Clear Coat” to 25% concentration, using MMP Thinner (no polymix added) and started applying in dry coats. Dry coating is new to me, but eventually got the hang of it. It does take good lighting and proper surface placement to see the where the flat coat is landing.


How much Flat? I stopped when the overall appearance was flat enough and the decals didn’t look like decals. The flat finish looks good, and although it’s somewhat “pebbly” and it’s really tough.

Time for the little bit of weathering I usually do. Using Testors Createfx Black Wash (its not really black – sort of a brownish black) I accented selected spots: some structural plates, a few joint lines, and other spots remembering less is more.


A word (or two) about the canopy. I used the supplied closed canopy. My first attempt at masking failed. I tried using Tamiya masking tape and a new, sharp X-Acto blade to cut my own masks. This worked OK for the back three sections, but the forward windscreen was something else. I applied tape, burnished it down so I could see separation between canopy and framing and started cutting. Zoukei-Mura’s framing is so delicate, that my cuts were in the wrong place and I ended up with gashes across the flat front panel. So, I purchased, DNModel’s masks for the Zoukei-Mura F-4s. These masks don’t look or feel like tape; more like thin adhesive-backed mylar. Packaging says they’re reusable, and they probably are if you’re careful about removing them from the painted model. They really do a great job, particularly on the front canopy section with the tiny curves at the top.

After masking, the canopy was airbrushed Medium Grey with a Flat Clear coat.

Painting complete, time for final assembly – all the little parts I left off so I wouldn’t break them during painting. One of my modeling rules: don’t glue anything on the model until it’s absolutely necessary. Landing gear gear and wheels, landing gear doors with the tiny actuators, inboard slats and actuators, outboard slats, stabilators, wing pylons with AIM-9s, centerline tank, vertical fin mounted pitot tube (broken off), cockpit levers and seats… and more.

Finally, the last step was adding the canopy. Since I didn’t want to scratch it or end up with dust on the inside, I dry fit and trimmed the canopy then attached it with un-thinned Elmer’s white: wiping off the excess with a damp Q-tip. I then used Elmer’s on a paint brush as a filler for the gap, again removing the excess. Finally, I hand brush Medium Gray over the joint lines.



Model Complete:

Total (calendar) time, start to finish: four months.


I’m looking forward to another Z-M Phantom; a “J” or a “D” something with a bit more color. But first, a model that offers more immediate gratification; Eduard’s FW-190D. Mission Models are now my go-to paints, (I notice that Eduard’s latest instructions include MMP equivalents in addition to Creos). Although I’m still learning how they work with my particular airbrush. I’m learning patience and layering thin coats instead of flooding the surface. Since MM paints dry quickly (I’ve masked after as little as 10 minutes) this isn’t such a hassle.

For those photographically inclined, pics were taken with a Canon 7D with a 24-105mm lens. Lighting was a combination of Ott-lights, natural lighting, and incandescent. RAW files were processed using DXO Photo Lab software, correcting for white balance, cropping, noise reduction and lens sharpening.


Photo 1:

Looks like a Phantom to me! The main landing gear bulges required to accommodate the wider wheels show in this photo.




Photo 2

The splitter plate in the port cheek ram air inlet is apparent. The left main landing gear started to collapse, and I didn’t catch it in time to fully correct it. Next time, I’ll know what to expect. Auxiliary air inlets and air brakes are modeled in the closed position. The flaps are drooped.




Photo 3

The fuselage walkway, a decal from the Furball set, was placed too far outboard. The inside edge should align with the line between the engine intake and the upper fuselage bulge. I didn’t notice this until several days after the decal was placed. I found replacements from decals designed for the Academy F-4, but because of the differences in models they didn’t fit. I decided to live with it. Next time I may paint the walkway.



Photo 4

From this angle, the outboard fixed slats and the inboard retractable slats are apparent. On a real bird the inboard slats would likely be retracted but I installed them in the deployed position. The instructions don’t mention mounting the slats retracted, but with careful surgery on the actuators it probably can be done.



Photo 5

I’ve read some kit reviews which claim that the contours of the aft fuselage aren’t correct. I believe the area in question is above the “MARINES” decal. I looked at the finished kit in plan view, comparing it to original drawings and this may be correct but any deviations are very minor.




Photo 6

Looking at this photo, I think I mis-aligned the inlet star and bar. The F-4 was designed as a missile-armed interceptor and aircrew vision to the rear wasn’t a consideration, as you can see. The Mig 21 was worse. Kit instructions identify the clear red part as “Air Refueling Light”. I didn’t know that. VMFA-232’s Satan head emblem, considerably toned down in one oof the few squadron specific markings.





Photo 7

The aft fuselage metal panels were painted with “Duraluminum” with a few panels highlighted with “Dark Aluminum”. Engine nozzles and the area immediately aft of the nozzles was oversprayed with “Cold Rolled Steel” for a darker finish. Panel lines were accented with Tamiya Black Panel Line Accent Color, and a light coat of Testors Createfx Black wash was applied was applied to tone down the finish. One detail frequently missed is the drag chute door an the aft fuselage end. This was (almost?) always painted the upper surface camouflage color.


Photo 8

Stabilator metal areas used “White Aluminum, Dark Aluminum (center panel) and “Duraluminum” (for the leading edge slots). VMFA-2232’s red devil squadron badge in miniature is the only color marking on this aircraft.



Photo 9

The decals use for ejection seat harnesses look OK with closed canopy. Using DN Models’ canopy masks worked wonders on the complex canopy framing shapes.






Photo 10

The little-seen undersurfaces. I attempted a bit more weathering than usual on the undersurfaces. Missiles should be Light Ghost Gray, same color as the undrsurface, but I used Dark Ghost Gray to provide more contrast. The forward missile wells are empty.




Photo 11

The kit AIM-7Ms are very nice, particularly the external cabling conduit. Brown and yellow stripes are from kit decals applied with lots of Solva-Set. Additional decals are from TwoBob’s Sidewinder/Sparrow decal sheet. Kit instructions note that both missile fuselage conduits are oriented outboard, a detail I would have missed.


Materials Used:

Aftermarket Accessories:

1) Zoukei-Mura J/S Photo-Etch Set


1) Furball Aero-Design Lo-Viz Devil Dog Rhinos (48-063)

2) Furball Aero-Design F-4B/N, J/S Cockpit Detail Set (48-047)

3) Two Bobs AIM-9B/D/G/J/L/M, AIM-7E-2/M Missile Markings (48-086)


1) Testors Liquid Glue for Plastics- for plastic to plastic

2) Plastic-Weld Liquid Plastic Glue- where capillary action works

3) Bob Smith Industries 5-minute Epoxy – where strong joints are required and aren’t visible

4) Elmer’s White Glue – for canopy and attaching flat PE parts


Canopy Mask: DN Models

Canopy and Wheel Masks for Zoukei Mura SWS No. 4, 5, 6, 7 (48/827-045)


Airbrush: Iwata HP Plus C, 0.3mm Nozzle (Editor’s Note:  We have to talk about this, Richard ) 🙂


All Paints used were Mission Models as follows:

MMA-004 Flat Clear Coat

MMA-006 Gloss Clear Coat

MMM-002 Cold Rolled Steel

MMM-005 Duraluminum

MMM-007 Dark Aluminum

MMM-008 White Aluminum

MMP-072 3523 Medium Grey

MMP-073 FS 36375 Light Ghost Grey

MMP-074 FS 36320 Dark Ghost Grey

MMP-104 FS 17875 Insignia White

MMS-002 White Primer

MMS-003 Grey Primer

More ZM Phantom Pics Below: